The Dignity, and Benefit, of the Priesthood; The Lawfulness of Marriage in the Clergy; The Hardships of Them, and their Families, in This Nation; and The Excellency of the Charity by which they are re&rehy;lieved, &c. ― Set forth in a SERMON Preached before the SONS of the CLERGY, AT THEIR Anniversary Meeting, IN THE CATHEDRAL-CHURCH OF St. PAUL; December 8, 1720.By Joseph Trapp, M.A.Published at the Request of the Stewards for That Year.LONDON: Printed for Jonah Bowyer at the Rose in St. Paul's Church-yard, 1721.

To the Reverend and Worthy William Lupton, D.D. Thomas Westley, M.A. Prebendary of Wells. Thomas Croft, M.A. John Hill, M.A. And to the Worthy Mr. Samuel Sheppard, Mr. James Lisle, Mr. Joshua Symonds, Mr. John Rogers, Mr. Thomas Jones, Mr. Thomas Sympson, Mr. George Sibbald, Mr. Thomas Martin, STEWARDS For the late Feast of the SONS of the CLERGY, THIS SERMON, Preached and Printed At Their Request, Is DEDICATED, By their most Affectionate, Humble Servant, Joseph Trapp.

2 Kings IV.I,2. Now there cried a certain Woman of the Wives of the Sons of the Prophets unto Elisha, saying; Thy Servant my Husband is dead; and thou knowest that thy Servant did fear the Lord: And the Creditor is come to take unto him my two Sons to be Bondmen.

And Elisha said unto her, What shall I do for thee? Tell me, What hast thou in the House? And she said; Thine Handmaid hath not any thing in the House, save a Pot of Oil.

&Tic;HE Imperfection of our mortal State is in nothing more evi&rehy;dent, than in This; that it's very Pleasures are founded upon Pain: As the Pleasure of Eating and Drinking, for example, upon the Pain of Hunger and Thirst. Of the same Truth our present Assembling together is another In&rehy;stance. For though it be in it self of a festi&rehy;val Nature, attended with sacred Musick in the House of God, and at least, with innocent Musick in the House of Feasting; all which is perfectly proper; since we meet upon so delightful a Design, as That of promoting the Relief of the Needy, and mutual Love among Our selves: Yet so it is, a melancholy Subject lies at the Root of all; and our Re&rehy;joicing is grounded upon our Mourning: As That Last again is upon the Mourning of O&rehy;thers. The Tears of Widows and Orphans are our Summons to This chearful Meeting: Which yet ought to be a chearful one, be&rehy;cause the End of it is to contribute what we can to wipe Those Tears away. The over-ruling Providence of God has been pleased, for Reasons infinitely Wise and Just, to set These Two, the One over-a&rehy;gainst the Other; as the Royal Preacher expresses himself concerning Pros&rehy;perity and Adversity. Eccles. 7.14.

The very hearing of my Text at This Time, naturally suggests the foregoing Reflection. Since it is entirely applicable to This festival Occasion; and yet gives us an Historical Ac&rehy;count of an Incident, to the last degree dis&rehy;tressful. An holy Man of God is just dead; leav&rehy;ing his Family in such miserable Circumstan&rehy;ces; that his Widow is crying out for Help a&rehy;gainst a Creditor, who, in defect of Money to defray his Debts, is violenty seizing upon his two Orphans, and dragging them into Bon&rehy;dage. These are the only Possessions of any Value which he leaves behind him: For his Widow being asked what she has more to sa&rehy;tisfy the Creditor; What hast thou in the House? In the Bitterness of her Soul, returns This humble, and modest, and therefore the more moving, Answer; Thine Handmaid hath not any thing in the House, save a Pot of Oil. A hopeful Provision for a Widow and two Orphans! besides the discharging of the Debts! She has already lost her Husband; and They their Father: And for That very Reason She is now upon the point of losing Them; and They of losing Themselves, i.e. of becoming Slaves, or being a Part of the Goods and Property of another Family. For (as I before hinted) their Father is so far from leaving any Ef&rehy;fects, as we speak, to maintain his Children; that (besides the Pot of Oil above mentioned) the only Effects he leaves, even to pay his Debts, are Those Children.

Had Those Obligations been contracted by his own Extravagance, or Neglect; we should greatly blame the Deceased, however we might pity the Survivers. But we are assured, that he was one who feared the Lord; a Cha&rehy;racter utterly inconsistent with That in&rehy;famous Principle of Wickedness and Folly. Thy Servant my Husband is dead; and thou knowest that thy Servant did fear the Lord. Which prepares our Commiseration for the Distress that follows. Those Incumbrances indeed may be, and often are, occasioned by a Man's own Vices and Mismanagement: But Those too, like other Troubles and Afflicti&rehy;ons, may, and often do, fall upon Persons strictly Religious, purely by their Misfortune, not at all by their Fault.

By the Sons of the Prophets, are meant the Disciples, and Attendants, of the Prophets; Themselves being instituted to, and designed for That Office; and even actually exercising it in some measure, viz. as Ministers, or Assistants, to the Prophets, and acting by their Designation, or Appointment. Thus One of them, by the Order of Elisha, anoint&rehy;ed Jehu to be King of Israel. 2 Kings 9. Nay, sometimes (though not so ordinarily) they exercised it directly, and immediately, under God himself. As 1 Kings 20.35, & seqq. And a certain Man of the Sons of the Prophets said unto his Neighbour in the Word of the Lord, smite me, I pray thee, &c. And pronoun&rehy;ces a Prophesy, or delivers a Message from God to King Ahab, v. 42. And he said unto him, Thus saith the Lord; because thou hast let go out of thine hand a Man whom I appointed to utter Destruction, therefore thy Life shall go for his Life, and thy People for his People. And not only so, but he is expresly called a Prophet, v. 38. and 41. In short, They were an Inferiour Order in the Prophetical Col&rehy;lege; and much the same to the Superiour Order, or to the Prophets, commonly, and eminently so called, as Levites to the Priests under the Law, and Deacons to the Priests under the Gospel. And since a Part of the Prophetical Office was to teach, and instruct; which is likewise called Prophesying in the New-Testament; We of the Clergy are in That Respect Prophets, or Sons of Prophets; and so the Text is every way applicable to the present Solemnity.

It was one of This Order therefore, whose Widow makes the pathetical Complaint here mentioned. From which I shall take Occasi&rehy;on briefly to discuss several Particulars; some directly, others collaterally, or by Analogy, tho' not directly, deducible from it. Of the for&rehy;mer Kind are These. That the State of Mar&rehy;riage is not prohibited to Persons of an holy Function: &horfill; A Woman of the Wives of the Sons of the Prophets: That the Afflictions of This Life are incident to the best of Men, and their Families; &horfill; Thy Servant did fear the Lord, and the Creditor is come, &c. Lastly, That Those who are piously inclined, will be ready to assist the Widows and Orphans of such Persons, especially Those of a sacred Chara&rehy;cter; And Elisha said unto her, what shall I do for thee? Of the latter Kind are These. That certain consecrated Orders of Men are useful, and even necessary, being appointed by God himself; that great is the Dignity of their Office; and that they ought to be esteemed accordingly: This is implyed in the Mention of particular Orders, instituted by God, Prophets, and Sons of Prophets: That the Temporal Condition of Spiritual Persons in This Nation, to which we belong, is, up&rehy;on the Whole, very hard and unequal: This I observe, by way of Accomodation, from the main Drift and Tenour of the Text; This miserably impoverished Man of God, and his Family, looking like a Type of the indi&rehy;gent Clergy of England, and Theirs: Lastly, That not only Spiritual Persons themselves, but their more immediate Relations, are particu&rehy;larly obliged to the exemplary Practise of Ver&rehy;tue and Religion: This I deduce from the Widows urging That Argument, viz. that her Husband feared the Lord; In which it may be imply'd, that She herself was one of the same Character; otherwise she would not be so likely to alledge That Argument. That she thought her self particularly obliged to exemplary Vertue by her Relation to her Husband, is not, I acknowledge, so much as hinted: But I take leave to graft This Part of the Observation upon the Other; since it is true in it self, and applicable to the De&rehy;sign of our present Meeting.

I have hitherto mentioned These Propositions, and placed them in This View, only to distinguish between Those which are directly, and Those which are indirectly, deducible from the Words I have chosen; that I may not seem to lay more stress upon a Text, than it will really bear. But I shall, for the Sake of Method, discourse upon them in a different Train; so that every subsequent Proposition may naturally follow That which immediately precedes it.

I observe therefore,

That certain sacred Orders of Men are useful, and even necessary, being instituted by God himself; that great is the Bene&rehy;fit and Dignity of their Office; and that they ought to be loved, and honoured ac&rehy;cordingly. That the State of Marriage is not prohibited to such Orders of Men. That not only such Persons themselves, but their Families likewise, are par&rehy;ticularly obliged to the Practise of exampla&rehy;ry Piety and Vertue. That the Afflictions of This Life are accident to the best of Men, whether Tem&rehy;poral, or Spiritual, and to their Families, as well as to others. That the Temporal Condition of Spi&rehy;ritual Persons, and their Dependants, in This Church and Nation, is, upon the Whole, very hard and unequal. That good and pious Christians, whe&rehy;ther Laity, or Clergy, will, according to their Ability, contribute to relieve and sup&rehy;port them.

Upon These Heads I shall discourse, as they lie before us; and, in as few Words, as the Importance of them will permit.

I. First then I observe, That certain sa&rehy;cred Orders of Men are useful, and even ne&rehy;cessary; being instituted by God himself; that great is the Benefit and Dignity of their Office; and that they ought to be lo&rehy;ved, and honoured accordingly. I say, I observe This: For I pretend not here to prove it at large: Nor would there be any Occasi&rehy;on of proving it at all; were every one, who calls himself a Christian, really such. Those among our Adversaries, who believe any thing of the Bible, must, and I think, do acknowledge, that the Jewish Prophets and Priests were by Divine Institution; because That People was under the immediate, and even visible, Inspection of God himself. And the same they are pleased to grant of the Apostles, and Others who had the Gift of working Miracles; under the Gospel Dispen&rehy;sation. But as We have no such direct and particular Revelations, nor any such extra&rehy;ordinary Powers; they imagine that they have room to object against the Commission of our Ministry, said to be derived through so many Ages by a continued and regular Succession. They may indeed object against This; and we cannot help it. But whoever shall consider, that our Blessed Saviour pro&rehy;mised his Apostles to be with them always, even unto the End of the World; Matth. 28.20. which could not be meant of their own Persons only, since they did not continue in the World any longer than other Men: That Those Apostles, confessed on all hands to be divinely inspired, did conceive themselves authorized, not only to ordain Others, but to communicate to them the Power of Ordain&rehy;ing, as appears (to pass over many more In&rehy;stances) from That of St. Paul to Timothy, Lay hand suddenly on no man: 1 Tim. 5.32. That they actually did both execute, and delegate such a Commission, if they may be al&rehy;lowed to understand their own Meaning: And Lastly, That the same has in Fact, by universal Practice, and continued Succession, been delivered downwards, from the Begin&rehy;ning of Christianity to This Day; Who&rehy;ever, I say, shall consider all This, and yet deny, or so much as question, the Divine Commission of Us, who at This Day call ourselves the Ministers of Christ, must ei&rehy;ther be a Hypocrite while he pretends to believe any thing of the Gospel; or one of Those perverse Opiniatres, who dispute about every thing, and therefore are not fit to be disputed with about any thing.

But the Truth of the Matter is, Those who deny the Authority of Christ's Ministers are really not true Christians: It appear&rehy;ing from the whole Tenour of the Scriptures, that such an Authority is blended with the very Vitals and Essence of the Religion we profess. The same Sort of Arguments which prove the Truth of Christianity, prove the Truth and Necessity of sacred Orders in general, and even of Episcopacy in particu&rehy;lar: They are all Three Points of Fact, not of Reason: And if we can baffle the Evi&rehy;dence, given by History, and universal Tra&rehy;dition, for the Two Last, we effectually overturn the Foundations of the First.

Not but that from Reason, joined with, and arguing from Revelation, we may clear&rehy;ly evince the Necessity of That for which we are contending. The Apostle assures us, that sa&rehy;cred Orders were instituted for the perfecting of the Saints, for the edi&rehy;fying of the Body of Christ. Eph. 4.12. And is not That Edifying, and Perfecting, as necessary in One Age, as in Another? In This of Ours, as in That of the Apostles? Original Sin has made it ne&rehy;cessary, that there should be a Mediator be&rehy;tween God and Man: This is Jesus Christ, who has substituted inferiour Mediators un&rehy;der him, to transact between God and Man upon Earth, as he himself does in Heaven. We are his Ministers, his Ambassadors, as he is King: His Priests, as he is High&rehy;Priest; and his Deputy-Teachers, as he is Prophet. All Kings, High-Priests, Chief Prophets, must necessarily, and in the Na&rehy;ture of Things, have their Substitutes to act under them; especially where They them&rehy;selves do not personally reside. Original Sin therefore, which is the Source of Actual, has render'd the Office of Priesthood necessary. But the Mischief is, These Men do not be&rehy;lieve Original Sin: Tho' upon a Supposal of it the whole Oeconomy of the Redemption by Jesus Christ is entirely founded. They ac&rehy;knowledge, (as I observed) that among the Jews, the Divine Authority of Priesthood was clear; because it was appointed by God him&rehy;self, personally and miraculously residing in the Midst of them. And yet even among Them, there were not wanting Some, who affirmed, that all the Congregation were holy, every one of them; or, in the la&rehy;ter Dialect, That no Man has more Right to execute the Office of a Priest, than Ano&rehy;ther. Numb. 16.3. But we know what was the Conse&rehy;quence of This: And our modern Rebels would do well to consider, that They may perish in the Gainsaying of Korah, though in a different Manner; that the Sin is still the same, notwithstanding miraculous Punish&rehy;ments are ceased; that a Man may go into the Pit, even into the bottomless Pit, though the Earth does not open her Mouth, and cleave asunder under them.

The Objections of the Romanists against the Validity of our Orders in This Church, (however backed and fortify'd by Some a&rehy;mong Ourselves, who make a Show of more than ordinary Zeal against Popery) have been abundantly refuted by learned Men; who were willing to answer even the most frivolous Cavils; though at the same time they well knew, that they did them more Honour than they deserved: They being founded upon a Calumny, in point of Fact, so groundless, and childish; that it is hard to say, Whether the Fable of the Nag's-Head, urged by the Papists against the Church of England, or That of the As&rehy;ses's-Head, urged by the Heathen against the Primitive Christians, be the more sense&rehy;less and ridiculous Story of the Two.

The Benefits conveyed by Means of our Ministry are truly inestimable; if Remissi&rehy;on of Sins, Spiritual Grace, and the King&rehy;dom of Heaven, may be so accounted. Not that we pretend to confer them directly, or to have them at our own Disposal, to be granted, or denied, at our Will and Plea&rehy;sure; or that they cannot possibly be confer&rehy;red without us: All This is Scandal upon us; among a thousand other Slanders, by which we are daily misrepresented, that we may be render'd odious to the People. But we are, and we do pretend to be, the ordinary, standing Means, or Instruments, through which, by God's Appointment, Those Benefits are conveyed. And This surely shews our Office to be highly be&rehy;neficial.

As for the Dignity of it; To omit innu&rehy;merable Texts of Scripture, which might be cited to the same Purpose, No man (says the Apostle) taketh this honour unto himself, but he that is ordained of God, as was Aaron. Heb. 5.4. And in another Place, We beseech you, Brethren, to know them which labour among you, and are over you in the Lord, and admonish you; and to esteem them very highly in love, for their work's sake. 1 Thess. 5.12,13.

To apply This then to the Consciences of Some in These Times: If They are to be honoured, why are they despised? If they are to be loved, why are they hated? It will be said, perhaps, not upon the Account of their Office, but of their personal Beha&rehy;viour. This is to be considered, under my fifth general Head. At present I say, that if it were true (as it is most false) it is no answer for Those of whom I am now chief&rehy;ly speaking: Because They hate, and despise, or rather really hate, and pretend to despise) Priests as Priests. Else how comes That re&rehy;freshing Word Priestcraft to be thrown out frequently, and with so important an Emphasis, as if it were equivalent to an hun&rehy;dred Arguments? Are they not perpetual&rehy;ly abusing and ridiculing our Office it self, and as such? Has not a certain Word in our Language (like the Word Tyrannus, and Others, in the Latin) by the Iniquity and Prophaneness of the Times, changed its Signification; so as from a Title of Digni&rehy;ty, to become a Name of Ignominy and Scorn? Insomuch, that though a Man be not only by his Education, and Abilities, and all fine Accomplishments, both natural, and acquired, but by noble Birth, and even temporal Fortune, far superiour to These Scoffers; yet his being a Parson, for which they ought to honour him more than for any other Character, or than for all the rest put together, so degrades him, and renders him vile in their Eyes; that it takes off from That Respect, which upon other Accounts they would otherwise pay him. Such Magick is there in the Sound of That poor despised Word: The Seal and Stamp of God's Authority, is, it seems, a Thing so contemptible in the Opinion of These Men. But They will deny that we have such Authority: And I say, we have again and again proved that we have; Let them answer our Arguments, I mean, really an&rehy;swer them, i.e. with Reason, instead of Scurrility, and we will be silent upon the Subject. In the mean time, they must give us Leave to think, and say too, that at least, the most Learned, and Knowing a&rehy;mong them, would, if they were able, of&rehy;fer the same Insults to God himself, as they do to his Ministers. For thus maliciously to persecute Those whom they know to be so, and because they are so; what is it, but in the worst of Senses, to defy the armies of the living God, to dart their Outrages in the Face of Heaven, and declare a Kind of War against Omnipotence? So true is That of our Blessed Saviour, which in These dangerous Days can scarce be too frequent&rehy;ly inculcated, and apply'd to the Successors of the Apostles, of whom it is as true as it was of the Apostles themselves; He that despiseth you, despiseth me; and he that despiseth me, despiseth him that sent me. Luke 10.16 And the same is to be said of hating, as of despising.

I pass the Practice of all Ages and Nati&rehy;ons, Heathen, as well as Patriarchal, Jew&rehy;ish, and Christian; by which it appears, that to love, and honour These sacred Offi&rehy;ces, and the Persons who bear them, is a Principle of natural, as well as of revealed Religion. To what has been said, I only add This Consideration, (hinted at before) That he who is God, as well as Man, is Priest and Prophet, as well as King. This, I confess, is no Argument with Those of our Adversaries, who deny his Divinity, and perhaps his Being: However, even from Them we may make This Observation, That the Chief of Those who are Enemies to These sacred Orders of Men, are at the same time Enemies to the Saviour who redeemed them, and to the God who made them.

And so I pass on to my Second Observati&rehy;on from the Text, viz.

II. That the State of Marriage is not pro&rehy;hibited to such Orders of Men. If it be forbidden in Scripture; it lies upon our Ad&rehy;versaries to tells us Where it is so: For ac&rehy;cording to the Laws of Arguing, We are not to prove that it is not forbidden, but They are to prove that it is. Yet in This Case, we can, with great Ease, do more than They can reasonably demand of us. The Example of my Text is clear, and plain: As are those of Samuel, Ezekiel, and Others in the Old Testament, and of St. Peter in the New: Who are all known to have been Married Men. As plain is the Doctrine of St. Paul, concerning the Wives and Chil&rehy;dren of Bishops and Deacons: As also the Practice of the Primitive Church, and of all Churches, except That of Rome, since it became corrupt by so many shameful Inno&rehy;vations, both in Doctrine, and Practice. A&rehy;mong which, That of imposing Yokes, and laying Snares is none of the least conside&rehy;rable. And the Necessity of Celibacy in the Clergy is a signal Instance of Both. 'Tis an arbitrary, tyrannical, unlawful Im&rehy;position; and a Snare to the Consciences of Men. Ecclesiasticks are moulded out of the same common Mass with Laicks; and Hu&rehy;man Nature is the same in Those as in These. In the Jewish Church, Priests were not only permitted to marry; but the Priesthood it self was hereditary. And whether among Jews, or Christians, it would be very wonderful, if a State sanctify'd by God, in the State of Man's Innocency, should be improper, and even unlawful for Men, who are sanctify'd by him, and for him: Or that what is the Type of the U&rehy;nion between Christ and his Church, should be prohibited to Those who are the Mini&rehy;sters of the First, for the Edification of the Last. As to the Church of Rome in par&rehy;ticular; it is to be admired, that She who pretends to a Supremacy over all other Churches, upon the Foundation of St. Pe&rehy;ter, should so strangely overlook his Example in This Instance. And that She who calls Marriage a Sacrament, should think any Sacrament fit to be given by a Priest, which is not fit to be received by him. In the Eucharist, (according to her Doctrine and Practice) Part of it is to be received by the Priest only: So that she denies Half of one Sacrament to the Laity, and another whole one (as she calls it) to the Clergy: Both by her own Authority; and without any manner of Foundation, either in Reason, Scripture, or Antiquity.

How far the Celibacy of Ecclesiasticks in That Church may have affected their Morals, I will not pretend to determine. Many Re&rehy;flections, we know, have been cast upon them: But though I charitably hope, and verily be&rehy;lieve, they are not all true; yet This is certain, that it would be better, if in all Churches where there have been Sons, and Daughters, there had likewise been Wives, of the Clergy.

Against the Marriage of whom the Ci&rehy;vil Society at least, can make no reasonable Objection: Since the Former, by their Children give so many Pledges to the Lat&rehy;ter: And by reason of Intermarriages be&rehy;tween the Families of Spiritual, and Tem&rehy;poral Persons, the State and the Church may mutually apply to each other That of David to Amasa, Art thou not of my bone, and of my flesh? Whereas the Church of Rome, by injoining Celibacy upon her Clergy, seems to set up an Interest, not only separate from the secular Government, but in Opposition to it. And however the Powers of the Church and of the State may be (as they certainly are) in their original Institution, not only distinct from, but inde&rehy;pendent of each other; there is no doubt, but that the more their Interests are inter&rehy;mingled, the more likely are Both to prosper and flourish.

One great Advantage in the married State of the Clergy, is their fuller Knowledge of the World, and their being experimentally acquainted with the various Turns and Ha&rehy;bitudes of human Nature. So that Those of all Relations to whom Many of us mi&rehy;nister, may in some measure, and by way of humble remote Analogy, apply to Us that the Apostle observes concerning the High Priest of our Profession; We have not Priests who cannot be touched with the feeling of Infirmities, but are in all Points tempted, like as we are. Heb. 4.15. We cannot go on, and add, yet without Sins: That is not without Falshood to be affirm&rehy;ed, nor almost without Blasphemy to be imagined. God knows in many Things we defend all; Clergy, as well as Laity, and the best of Both. We are not only tempted, but often foil'd by Temptation. Nor does our admitting That Word, as apply'd to Marriage, in the least derogate from the Truth of what I observe under This Head. Nay, I acknowledge, (and shall have Occasion to take Notice of it again before I conclude) that the Inconveniences which attend a marry'd Clergy, are many, and great; and that sundry Temptations are adapted to That very State of Life as such. But This is nothing to the Point: All Con&rehy;ditions in This World are subject to Temptations, and Inconveniences, to Corrupti&rehy;on, and Sin: And however what the Apo&rehy;stle intimates concerning Marriage, with relation to all Christians, especially in times of Persecution, may be particularly apply'd to the Clergy in all Times, He that marrys does well, and he that marrys not does better provided he be well assured, that he can avoid the Dangers attending a single Life; I say, however true This may be, the only Questions to our Purpose are These Two; Whether, any Power upon Earth has Au&rehy;thority to make That unlawful in point of Morality, which God left indifferent? And, Whether as the Inconveniences are great on one Side; so, all things considered, they are not greater on the other? As to the Latter, the Allowance of This State to the Clergy appears to be least exceptionable in point of Prudence and Expediency. And as to the Former, to make it directly unlawful to any Order of Men, is certainly the Height of Presumption: And we may with some Variation apply to This Case Those Words of our blessed Saviour, concerning Marriage in general; What God hath at least permitted to be join'd together, let not Man absolutely put asunder.

III. My Third Observation was This: That not only spiritual Persons Themselves, but their Families likewise are particularly obliged to the Practice of exemplary Piety and Vertue. That such Persons Themselves are so obliged, is acknowledged on all sides, and too plain to be questioned. And one Duty, among others, which is so incumbent upon them, is That of promo&rehy;ting Piety in their Families, and educating their Children in the nurture and admonition of the Lord: Lest they incur the Guilt of the old High Priest Eli, against whom the severest Judgment was denounced, be&rehy;cause his Sons made themselves vile, and he restrained them not. Sam. 3.13. And This more than ordinary Obligation upon the Master of the House induces a more than ordinary one like&rehy;wise upon Those of his Houshold. The One flows from the Other: Because the better any one is taught, the more he is obliged to learn, and practise.

But besides This, their very near Relati&rehy;on to a Person of a sacred Character, is a pe&rehy;culiar Tye upon their Consciences; because by Means of That Relation they are more likely than other Laicks, to give Offence, and to prejudice Religion by their ill Behaviour. St. Paul gives especial Directions concerning the Behaviour of the Wives of Deacons: And they are more strongly applicable to Those of Priests, and Bishops; and by Parity of Reason, to the Children of all Three. Who all ought seriously to ponder in their Minds, and apply to Themselves Those Words of the Apostle: If the Root be holy, so are the Branches: Rom. 11.16. And Those of the Prophet, Look unto the rock whence ye are hewn, and to the hole of the Pit whence ye are digged. Isai. 51.1. The Apostle teaches us, that the Chil&rehy;dren of all Christians are, as such, holy in one Sense; viz. as they are even in their Infancy capable of being baptiz'd 1 Cor. 7.14.: But the Children of Christ's Ministers are doubly sanctify'd, not only by the common Faith, but by the peculiar Function, of their Fathers.

But as the best Things are capable of be&rehy;ing abused, and the Corruption of the best is always the worst; it may accidentally happen, that such Children may be unholy upon the ve&rehy;ry Account of their Extraction: Which is no Wonder; since the same Thing may, and sometimes does, happen to their Fathers, upon the very Account of their Function. What should have been for their Health may be unto them an Occasion of falling: The Spiritual Food, and Physick, given them by their Parents, may be perverted to Poison; and their very Religious Education make them wicked. Thus Christi&rehy;anity it self, which by its natural Efficacy tends to Peace, does (as its Blessed Author foretold it would) sometimes by Accident cause Division. There are Temptations particular&rehy;ly adapted to the Children of the Clergymen. Those of them, for Instance, who are placed in the lower Part of Life, in mechanical, or other mean Occupations, being by their E&rehy;ducation more knowing, and more re&rehy;ligious than Persons of the same Craft generally are, may be tempted to Pride, and That the worst Sort of it Spiritu&rehy;al Pride; and, as a Consequence of This, to That most unchristian Vice Censori&rehy;ousness; may be apt to exercise themselves in great Matters which are too high for them; to despise their Equals, and be insolent to their Superiours; to be impatient under Afflicti&rehy;ons, and ungrateful to their Benefactors. Against These, and such like, Corruptions they ought to be carefully guarded; ear&rehy;nestly to pray God, that the good Seed sown by their Parents may not be lost up&rehy;on bad Ground; sincerely to repent of any Misbehaviour they may have been guilty of in any of These Respects; and seriously to consider the Deceitfulness of Sin; which is such, that, without great Care and Caution on our Part, it may turn our very Advan&rehy;tages to our Detriment: So that the Chil&rehy;dren of Clergymen may for That very Rea&rehy;son, joined with others, be twofold more the Children of Hell. They may likewise be scornful, and fastidious, to mean Trades; be&rehy;cause in their Father's Family they were better bred: Not considering, that, to ballance This, they were religiously bred too; taught Meek&rehy;ness, and Humility, Contentment in low Circumstances, and Patience in distressful ones; that the blessed Apostles of their Sa&rehy;viour were Fishers, Tentmakers, and the like; and their Saviour himself the reputed Son of a Carpenter.

Another Fault, though not peculiar to Them only, of which Some among them are said to be guilty, (and which, if they are, I am sure they ought to reform) is especial&rehy;ly to be mentioned upon the Occasion of our present Meeting; because it relates to their indigent Circumstances. I mean Those of Them (if such there be) who, if there be One among them who is Himself a Clergyman, are unreasonable in their Ex&rehy;pectances from him, and make him un&rehy;grateful Returns for what they have alrea&rehy;dy received. Because he is a Clergyman, they imagine they have a Right to lay any Loads upon him; whether he be able to bear them or no; and are continually reminding him, that he is bound in Duty to support his Colla&rehy;teral Relations. No doubt he is so, if it be in his Power, and if it be consistent with his superiour Obligations to Others: But of That He is to judge, not They; Though they may have Presumption enough to in&rehy;struct Him, from whom they ought in Meek&rehy;ness and Humility to receive Instructions. According to Their Doctrine, That of the Scripture is revers'd; and a Man, instead of leaving even his Father, and his Mother, and cleaving to his Wife, must leave his Wife and Children, and cleave to his Brothers and Sisters. Gen. 2.24.

I must confess indeed, (if I may take Oc&rehy;casion from hence to make a little Digression) that, in my humble Opinion, the above men&rehy;tioned Law, if we understand it of any Thing more than local Leaving, which indeed I be&rehy;lieve is all that is strictly and literally intend&rehy;ed by it, does not take place with regard to a Man's Father and Mother, as compared with his Children; however it may with regard to his Wife: As to the Latter it takes place, in respect of Those Contracts or Agreements which were made before Marriage. That it obliges with Reference to These, must be granted; because no Charity is truly such, which is founded upon Injustice. But as to one's Parents compared with one's Children, my Meaning is This, (and it affects Laity and Clergy in common) If both be e&rehy;qually indigent, (and other Circumstances equal, or very near it) the Former have the first Title or Claim to our Assistance. The dearness of Blood is the same in Both: And though it be commonly said, that natural Af&rehy;fection rather descends, than ascends; yet I doubt This is no good Principle of Human Nature. Among Brutes, indeed it is in Fact so: But the Case here is quite different, for reasons too plain to be insisted upon: And our Rational Faculties were given us to cor&rehy;rect the Errours of the Animal Ones. Whether the natural Yearnings, in Men of the best Temper, be stronger to the Parent, or to the Child, is not easy to determine: But This is undoubted, that the Obligation to the First is prior and superiour: And we are not so much obliged to Those whom we edu&rehy;cate, as to Those by whom we were educa&rehy;ted ourselves. There is in Nature and Reason something more emphatical in our Duty to the Former, than to the Latter: The one is called Piety, the other barely Duty; And Those Words of the wise Man must sure&rehy;ly draw Tears from all good Christians, when their Parents are in Poverty and Di&rehy;stress; Hearken unto thy Father that begat thee, and despise not thy Mother when she is old. Prov. 23.22.

But to return from This Digression; If the Children of God's Ministers are particularly obliged to be holy in all manner of Conver&rehy;sation; what is to be said of Those among them, who turn Profligates, and Libertines, both in Principles, and Practise, on purpose to disown their Parentage? Why we must say of them, that from being ashamed of one's Glo&rehy;ry, it is a short Step to glorying in one's Shame: Which is the last Degree of Wickedness. Some of the most envenomed Arrows that have of late Years been shot against the Church and Religion, have, as it is said, been drawn from the Quivers of Those who are Sons of her Ministers. If it be asked, why may not Both be furiously and openly at&rehy;tacked by Some, who, notwithstanding their Extraction, are mere Laicks, as well as un&rehy;dermined, and in a great measure even o&rehy;penly (though not so furiously) assaulted by Others, who are not only Clergymen's Sons, but Clergymen themselves: I leave the Answer to the Persons concerned; and say no more of the Thing it self at present; but proceed to my Fourth Observation, which was This, viz.

IV. That the Afflictions of This Life are accident to the Best of Men, whether Spiritu&rehy;al, or Temporal; and to their Families, as well as to Others. This needs no Proof: Nor should I have laid down This Head, but for the sake of its Connexion with what precedes, and follows it. The Example in my Text is plain: Religion and Experience concur, to verify This Proposition. This World neither is, nor was ever intended to be, a State of Reward and Punishment, but of Trial. Here, as the race is not to the swift, nor the battle to the strong, nor bread to the wise, nor riches to men of under&rehy;standing, nor favour to men of skill, so neither is Reward to the Righteous, nor Punish&rehy;ment to the Wicked; but Time and Chance happens to them all Eccles. 9.11.. There is indeed in the New Testament something of Promise as to Temporals, though not much: But it is not my Business to discuss This Point at present. I only observe, that Spiritual good Men, and Their Families, are no more exempt from the Calamities of This Life, than Tem&rehy;poral. The Tribe of Levi, however sepa&rehy;rated from the rest of Mankind in other Respects, is not at all separated from them in This. And yet a certain popular Saying, that the Children of Clergymen (as distin&rehy;guished from Those of the Laity) are gene&rehy;rally unfortunate, is full as easily denied by Some, as affirmed by Others. Neverthe&rehy;less certain it is, that, taking things in gross, the secular Circumstances of Them, and of their Parents, are in This Part of the World bad enough. Which leads me to my Fifth Observation, viz.

V. That the Temporal Condition of Spi&rehy;ritual Persons, and of their Families in This Church and Nation, is, upon the Whole, very hard and unequal. The Hardships under which the Clergy labour, are of Two Kinds; Those which are imputable to the accidental Corruption of the Age in which we now live, and relate not only to their For&rehy;tunes, but likewise to their Reputation, their Studies, and the whole Course of their Mini&rehy;stry: And Those which relate to their For&rehy;tunes only, by the Necessity of our Constitution it self, ever since a very Material Change was made in it. The Last mentioned only are im&rehy;mediately and directly to be accomodated to the Design of my Text, and of our present Assembly: But the First are by no means forreign to our Purpose; and are too considera&rehy;ble to be passed over in Silence, upon This publick and solemn Occasion.

In Those Respects then the Ministers of the Gospel in our Church are ill treated; be&rehy;cause the Church, and the Gospel it self, are so: For the Sake of which, we are calumni&rehy;ated to such a Degree, that we are obliged to be continually making Defences(or, as they were anciently called, Apologies) for our selves; like Those of the primitive Fa&rehy;thers to the Heathen Emperors, and Magi&rehy;strates, in Times of Persecution. For there may be Persecution, or something ve&rehy;ry like it, from private Persons, as well as from the higher Powers. The Time would fail us; should we go about to give a Detail of Instances exemplifying the Treatment we receive from some Men. I say from some Men: For even in These licentious Times the generality of the People have a great Love and Reverence for the Church and Clergy: And Many of the Gentry and Nobility are not only affectionate, and respectful, (for so I trust, and believe, Most of them are) but liberal, and munificent, to Both. The Lord remember Them, and Theirs, concerning This; and eternally reward their good Will to Si&rehy;on. But then too many have exceeding evil Will at Sion: And without Restraint or Controul express it in the most publick and insolent Manner; representing the Ministers of Christ in This Church, as the worst and vilest of Mankind; even worse, (if possible) than they Themselves really are: Making it their whole Employment and Study to blacken and traduce them, by charging them with what is false, and monstrously aggrava&rehy;ting what is true; laying the Faults of the Worst among them upon the Best; of Some upon All, and of the Persons upon the Fun&rehy;ction itself. Nay, so far does their Malice blind them; that their Slanders are incon&rehy;sistent in their Nature; and by abusing Us, they contradict one another, and very often Themselves. Thus for Instance, the main Body of the Clergy are represented as sordidly covetous, and profusely luxurious; sneakingly meanspirited, and insolently proud; crafty as Serpents, more silly than Doves; formidable for their Wealth and Power, contemptible for their Poverty and Weak&rehy;ness. In short, Priests, wicked Priests, is the Outcry of the whole Party: Insomuch, that were a Stranger in our Israel to receive no Information concerning us, but what he has from the Conversation, and Wri&rehy;tings of such as These; He must send his Thoughts to Sodom and Gomorrah for a Pa&rehy;rallel with the Generality of the English Clergy. Let Heaven and Earth, God and Man, even the Consciences of These Accusers Themselves be Witnesses, whether the Character They give be really true; nay, whether the very Reserve of it be not true: And if so, whether there were ever any Age or Nation, in which so many Thou&rehy;sands of innocent, pious, and holy Men, whose constant Business and Labour is to save Souls, even the Souls of their most bitter Enemies, for whom they continually offer up their Prayers to the Throne of Grace, who by their Office are Servants of the most High God, Most of them with Meek&rehy;ness and Patience struggling under extreme hard Circumstances, All of them as to tem&rehy;poral Regards weak and defenceless, were ever with such unchristian Prophaneness, with such unmanly Bareness and Cowardise, with such inhuman Cruelty, with such Di&rehy;abolical Malice, outraged and insulted? All of them have their Infirmities, and even their many and grievous Sins: The Best of them are but Men; and Some of them, no doubt, very wicked Men: For the Last, let Them look to it, and be assured that they will most severely answer for it. But what is That to the Purpose? Is our Case an Exception, in which it is good Logick to argue from Particulars to Universals? The Apostles themselves were not only Men, but sinful Ones: All of them were so; and One of them was the worst Man that ever lived. And we may, I am sure, with great Modesty affirm, that not One in Twelve among our Clergy is near so wicked as Judas Iscariot. Yet I never heard, that His being a Traytor was any Slur upon the other eleven Apostles.

I will only observe further, That what our Adversaries object concerning the ill Lives of Some, and the Infirmities of All, who minister in holy Things, is a most pro&rehy;phane Reflection upon the Wisdom of God himself; in making mere Men his more im&rehy;mediate Servants, and committing so rich a Treasure to Earthen Vessels.

As there are but Three great Concerns in which Mankind can be affected, their Estates, their Bodies, and their Souls; to answer These, there are so many Professi&rehy;ons, or Faculties appointed, Lawyers, Phy&rehy;sicians, and Divines: Only with This Dif&rehy;ference, the two First are from Men, the Last from God. And do the two First meet with the same ill Usage as the Last? They do not; and God forbid they should: But what should be the Reason of This? Why because Men value their Estates, and their Bodies, more than they do their Souls; because the World is wicked, irre&rehy;ligious, Atheistical: And the Wit of Man cannot assign any other adequate Reason. For without detracting from the real Ho&rehy;nour and Benefit of Those noble and use&rehy;ful Faculties, it is certain that the Other is the greatest of the Three; if Heaven be superiour to Earth, and Time less conside&rehy;rable than Eternity. And without reflect&rehy;ing upon any other Profession, or Body of Men, much less upon the Laity in general; we may justly add, that as the Clergy in an especial manner profess Religion, so they in an especial manner practise it: And I appeal to the Experience of the whole Kingdom, for the Truth of This Assertion. The Con&rehy;tempt of the Clergy therefore proceeds from the Contempt of Religion: And That again proceeds not so much from the Vices of the Clergy, as from the Vices of Those who despise and hate them. I say, not so much: For we are very ready to acknowledge, that if Any among Us are notoriously vici&rehy;ous, They greatly contribute towards it: For which (as I said before) They must severe&rehy;ly answer. And we leave This Subject at present, with That Observation of our Bles&rehy;sed Saviour: It must needs be that offences come; but woe to that man by whom the offence cometh. Mat. 18.7.

And as the Ministers of Christ in This Church are neither to be hated, nor despi&rehy;sed, upon the Account of their Behaviour; so I hope we may with Modesty presume to say, that they are not very contemptible in other Respects. It is a publick Truth, and ac&rehy;knowledged by every body in all Nations of the World, except Some in our own, that the Clergy of England, and her two famous Universities (in which the Sons of the Prophets are bred) have made their Country the Glory of all Lands. If, in These degenerate Times, they in some degree partake of the common Contagion, and are more and more corrupted; our Adversaries may be silent upon That Article: because that they are so, is chiefly, if not solely, to be imputed to Them, and their Principles.

To declaim against the Wickedness of the Age, is, I am sensible, the easiest, the dullest, and the most unpleasant Subject in Nature: And did we preach only to please Men, and to serve, or recommend our selves; it would certainly be the Last we should make choice of. But alas! That is a wretched Principle for a Minister of Jesus Christ, in the Execution of his Office. As we act upon other Views, we are constrain&rehy;ed to observe, upon This Article concern&rehy;ing the Hardships of the Clergy proceeding from Those of Religion, that Heresy, Infi&rehy;delity, and Atheism it self were never pro&rehy;pagated as they are Now; and that they are advanced to such a Pitch of bare-faced Impudence, as would be endured by no Nation under the Sun professing Christiani&rehy;ty, except our own. The Limits of our Time allotted for This Service permit me not so much as to mention the several Par&rehy;ticulars. And I have more-over This unhappy Excuse, that the Notoriety of the Facts renders it superfluous. One Thing it is much if we do not observe, in Conse&rehy;quence of These Abominations, that amidst our Controversies with one another (let Those see to it, who made them necessary) God's Controversy with the Nation in gene&rehy;ral, which has been a very long one, seems now to be drawing towards a Con&rehy;clusion. And, without pretending in the predictive Sense, to be either Prophets, or Sons of Prophets, we may say, that in all Appearance he has something very extra&rehy;ordinary ready to be discharged upon us; and that without a speedy, and wonderful Reformation, (of which there seems to be little Hope) it is morally impossible that he should forbear us much longer.

And here again (as in point of Practise, of which we have spoken before) it were to be wished, that the whole Tribe of Levi were entirely free from Infection. But as Some of them (though, God be prais'd, but very Few) have published their Names to the whole World, assuring us of the con&rehy;trary; we must be forced to acknowledge what, if it were possible, we should industri&rehy;ously conceal. Since it is not possible; the only Way to do our Duty to God, and Ju&rehy;stice to Ourselves, is as publickly and openly to protest against Those of our own Pro&rehy;fession; who would do well to consider, how much it tends to their Reputation, to have their Praises celebrated by the Tongues and Pens of Infidels and Atheists. As to the Honour of our Function in general; the foolish Arguing from Particulars to Uni&rehy;versals, and from Persons to Things, has been already taken notice of. Were we only attacked from Without, not betray&rehy;ed from Within; the united Powers of Earth and Hell could not hurt our Cause. Its pro&rehy;fessed Enemies would scarce be formidable; were it not for Traditors among our selves. So True is That Observation, Nothing can ruin the Church, but the Church: Meaning by the Latter, Those of her Ministers, who either openly oppose, or secretly undermine, both her temporal and spiritual Interests. Set&rehy;ting aside That, we might securely bid Defiance to the Powers of Darkness, to the Enemies of God and his Church; stand firm in one compacted Body, impenetrable to their Assaults; and be terrible against them as an Army with Banners. But, by the just Judgment of God, for our manifold Provocations, it happens to be otherwise; And we have, besides, This, Misfortune, that by reason of the Corruption, Vices, and Follies of the World, one bad Member a&rehy;mong Us can do more Mischief, than many sound ones can do Good. The Doctrine of the most holy, and ever blessed Trinity, has been impugn'd by Some, who might have made a better Use of their Talents, than by denying the Deity of Him who gave them. Others have argued against the Authority of the Church, the very Be&rehy;ing of their own Order, and all the Fences of Religion, whether Ecclesiasticall, or Civil: Advancing such prodigious Paradoxes upon These Subjects; that we are at a loss to de&rehy;termine, whether their Impiety be more detestable, or their Absurdity more ridicu&rehy;lous; and so whether they ought to be answered by Argument, or neglected with Contempt: Thus leaving us in a Strait between Wickedness and Nonsense; the on&rehy;ly Dilemma of any Moment they are able to put upon us. The most considerable of them have been over and over confu&rehy;ted, to a Demonstration: Confuted I say; for I despair of their ever being silenced: For the rest, I hope Nobody will be found so very idle, as to honour them with any confutation at all.

I will only observe This of them in com&rehy;mon, from the smallest to the greatest, that as they are not really of us, it would be kind in them to go out from among us; And, by the way, were Church-Discipline in full Force, I am sure they had long since been driven out from among us. If they must fight for our Enemies, let it be under Their Colours, not Ours: They would be more to Us, and (especially upon their boasted Principle of Sincerity) more consistent with Themselves, if they would no longer bear an Office which according to their Doctrine, is unlawful; nor wear the Habit of an Or&rehy;der which they do their utmost to de&rehy;stroy.

It would be just too, if These, and all other our Adversaries, whether Within, or Without, would not still charge Us with breaking the Peace; when They are the Ag&rehy;gressors, and We are upon the Defensive; when They are for introducing something New, and We are yet in Possession of the Old; when They are a Few single Persons obtruding their own private Notions upon the Pub&rehy;lick, and We are the main Body defending the Constitution of the Church, and the common Principles of Christianity. For the same Reasons it ill becomes Them, to upbraid Us with intemperate Heat, and Violence, Rudeness, Insolence, and Scurrility in our Disputes with them: Especially since They treat the whole Church with the last Degree of Haughtiness and Scorn. Besides the Arrogance, and contemp&rehy;tuous Behaviour, even of the most mo&rehy;derate among them, towards Some in parti&rehy;cular of the most shining Lights in our Church; One, especially, of her chief Mi&rehy;nisters, who, of all Men living, cannot be charged with excessive Passion; and whose great Learning and Piety, will ever be respected by All, but Those who have nothing, or not much, of Either.

We would farther intreat them to ask their own Consciences, whether they are sure they strictly adhere to Truth; while they go on in the old way of taxing Us with being Popishly affected: Whether they do not believe that We are at least as averse from the Corruptions of Rome, as Them&rehy;selves: Whether our Principles do not tend to keep out Popery, and Theirs to bring it in: Whether in Fact many more, than is usual in the same Space of Time, have not been perverted to it, since the late Propa&rehy;gation of Their Doctrines; and whether there be not a very good Reason to be gi&rehy;ven for it: Whether Those of our Church whom They condemn have not always been the greatest and most formidable Champions against Popery: And lastly, whether there be no Medium between a Papal Infallibility, and That Ecclesiastical Authority for which We contend. I am indeed not afraid to say, that, in some things, Papists (corrupt as they are, and Nothing can well be more corrupt) have been falsely accused by Protestants: and that in some, on the other hand, Pro&rehy;testants have been justly accused by Papists; particularly in the Instance of too much relaxing Ecclesiastical Discipline, and Want of Respect to Priests and Priesthood. Against which, and others, which might be named, we have nothing to alledge with Reason or Truth, but to wish we could give a better Answer, than That old, trite, and yet very emphati&rehy;cal, Saying, continually cited in such Cases;

&horfill; Pudet hæc opprobria nobis Et dici potuisse, et non potuisse refelli.

I am well aware that Reflections of This Kind are apt to be censured not only by All our Enemies, but by Some of our Friends; and Some of These too even a&rehy;mong the Clergy themselves: to be cen&rehy;sured at least as rash, and improper; and tending, at best, to do more harm, than good. I have already in a great measure obviated This Objection; but would far&rehy;ther beg them seriously to consider, that as there is a rash, and a false Zeal, so there is a prudent and a true one; that all Prudence does not consist in Silence, and Inactivity, no nor in Caution it self; that we are to preach the World of God in the Plainness and Simplicity of the Gospel, to open our Mouths boldly, to rebuke sharply, and with all Authority (which, by the way, our Adversaries profanely call Railing:) that there is a Difference between Security and Virulency; that Truth is Then to be most vigorously defended, when it most vigorously attacked; that we are to magnify our Office; and not to be ashamed of the Gospel of Christ; In a word, to put Men in mind of their Duty, whether they will hear, or whether they will forbear; and whatever be the Consequences, either to Them, or to Ourselves. However, upon This chearful, this feast&rehy;ing, this charitable Occasion, when we meet to promote mutual Love and good Works, Every thing, it will be said, that is harsh and grating should be wholly forborn. Would to God it were never our Duty to say things harsh and grating: No Man, I am sure, less delights in it than I do. As it is, I have already observed, that the original Occasion of this Meeting is, at best, of a mix'd nature, partly joyous, and partly grievous: Every thing therefore which is unpleasant may not, for That Reason, be improper upon This Subject. And if by the Corrupti&rehy;on of the World fresh Matter of That Kind daily arises, we are very sorry for it; but must do our Endeavour to hinder the Corrupt&rehy;ion from spreading. What would become of the Charity to the Widows and Children of Clergymen, and even of Clergymen Them&rehy;selves, if the Principles I have been warning against should finally prevail? And how na&rehy;turally Those Principles come to be consi&rehy;dered under This Head, concerning the Hardships of the Clergy arising from Those of Religion, I have already taken notice. Nor does softning, or smoothing them, tend to mutual Love and good Works; but the direct contrary; as it were easy to evince, would the Time permit. For my own Par&rehy;ticular, I can with Truth affirm, that if I have taken wrong measures, (and if I have, I beg Pardon of God, and Man) it pro&rehy;ceeded not from Rashness, and want of Consi&rehy;deration, but from Errour in Judgment, and want of Understanding; having, with all Coolness, seriously weighed and pondered These things; That there is not That Per&rehy;son upon Earth for whom I have the least ill Will; That what I have offered upon This Subject issued from a sincere Zeal for the Glory of God, and the Salvation of Souls, even the Souls of our worst Enemies; and, that in order to Those Ends, I take This to be the most Christian, and the most prudent, Method of proceeding.

But the Hardships of the Clergy, more immediately to be accommodated to my Text, and considered upon This Occasion, are Those which relate to their Fortunes only, by the Necessity of our Constitution it self, as it now stands, and has stood, for almost two Centuries of Years. Whatever Figure the Dignities of the Church, and some few inferiour Preferments may make, it is plain, that upon the Whole, no established Clergy in Christendom are so ill provided for in Temporals as Those of England: So un&rehy;conscionably excessive was the Pillage just before the Reformation. I say before it; for it was neither at, nor since, the Re&rehy;formation. And therefore the Papists have little Reason to upbraid Us, as they conti&rehy;nually do, with Those infamous Plunder&rehy;ings of the Church: Because He who made That deplorable Ravage was, in the main, not only of Their Religion, but a fiery, and in the worst of Senses, a burning Zealot for it. And though, for Reasons purely per&rehy;sonal, he flung off the Popes's Supremacy, and discarded a few other Corruptions; yet he intended nothing less, than That blessed Alteration of Religion, which immediately followed upon it: not by any De&rehy;sign of His, but by the wise Providence of God, drawing Good out of Evil, and turn&rehy;ing not only the Fierceness, but the Lust, and Ambition, of Men to his own Praise. Nor is it any thing strange, that he who did not abhor Idols, should at the same time commit Sacrilege. If Abbies and Mo&rehy;nasteries were to be demolished, and their Lands to be converted to other Uses; yet surely the Tithes, which even They had unjustly impropriated, should have been re&rehy;served to the Church, in consideration that the Parish-Clergy, whose Tithes were so impropriated, were before maintain'd by Those Societies. But to strip Parochial Livings and starve the Cure of Souls, was such an Instance of Depredation, as no History can parallel, and no Corruptions, or over-grown Wealth, and Power, of the Church, could justify. I speak only of the original Alienation of Those Revenues: As to the Detention of them Now, since they have been so long intermingled with tem&rehy;poral Estates; I pretend to determine No&rehy;thing about it, but leave That Matter to the Consciences of the Persons con&rehy;cerned.

This therefore is the real Cause why not only so many Widows and Orphans of Clergymen, but so many Clergymen Themselves are become Objects of Charity. They never had a tolerable Provision; and could not live of the Gospel; though (if we will believe St. Paul) it is most just and equitable that they should. Nor can they, to make up This Defect, apply themselves to secular Trades and Professions; because it is contrary to the Nature of their holy Fun&rehy;ction, and to the Canons of the Church concerning it. This, I say, is the true Cause of the Poverty we are considering: Not that the Children of Clergymen are di&rehy;stinguished by being unfortunate upon other Accounts; as it is falsely and uncharitably suggested. And that the Income of their Fathers departs with their Lives, is com&rehy;mon to Them with Multitudes of the Laity, even with the generality of them; and therefore idly urged (as it is by Many) a&rehy;gainst the Expediency of marrying with Clergymen. Were That all the Inconve&rehy;nience; They would fare much better, than they do at present. But the Mischief of all is That which I mentioned; not so much that their Revenues are lost, when they die; as that they are so little, while they live. Upon This Account, I confess, there is much Inconvenience in the Marriage of the Cler&rehy;gy: But so there is in every thing. And the Question is, (as I said) whether there be not more, and greater Inconveniences on the other side? And in This Case too, as well as in That just mentioned, the same may be said of the greatest part of the Laity; and so is not peculiar to the Clergy.

Thus miserably scanty is the Temporal Provision for Spiritual Persons in our Church: Insomuch, that were their Revenues to be equally divided, Each of them, one with another, would have no more, than is com&rehy;monly the annual Acquest of a very ordina&rehy;ry mechanical Tradesman; Half of them have actually no more; and Hundreds of them not a quarter so much. So that This our Corporation for the Relief of their poor Widows and Children is at once the Glory of That great Prince King Charles II. of blessed Memory, who first erected it, of His present Majesty, who enlarged it, and of Those many pious Christians who have, and still do, contribute to support it: And a Reproach to our Country in general, the Families of whose Clergy are by the above&rehy;mentioned Corruptions reduced to such a Condition, as to stand in need of it. How many worthy Men, both in Town, and Country, especially the Latter, of great Parts, and Learning, are bury'd in Obscuri&rehy;ty, and broken by Penury and Want, so that they have not an Opportunity of shewing That Merit, which would other&rehy;wise shine in the World! But Haud facile emergunt, quorum virtutibus obstat Res angusta domi. &horfill;

And though, as I observed under the for&rehy;mer Part of This Head, the Wickedness of some Laicks be the chief, nay the only full and adequate, Cause of the Contempt thrown upon Ecclesiasticks; yet certain it is, that the Poverty of the Last greatly contributes to&rehy;wards it: Which however it would not, could not do; were it not in Conjunction with the Vices and Irreligion of the First. So that the Clergy may apply to Themselves another melancholy Observation of the Heathen Author, just now cited:

Nil habet infelix paupertas durius in se, Quam quod ridiculos homines facit. &horfill;

The Ignorance of some of the Clergy need&rehy;ed not have been assigned by a certain very ingenious, though not very serious, Au&rehy;thor, as a Cause of their Contempt, separate from their Poverty; the Latter being the chief Cause of the Former. For how can it be expected, that there should be very learn&rehy;ed Incumbents upon Livings of Twenty, or Ten Pounds per Annum?

Many have a Saying among others equally wise, and religious, with refe&rehy;rence to Us; That so much is enough for a Clergyman; always, you may be sure, na&rehy;ming little enough. But supposing it were twenty times as much; Why for a Clergy&rehy;man, any more than for any body else? Are They of a different Make, or Mould, from Others? Or if They are; Their Wives and Children are not. Why should not such a one be not only well provided for, but very rich, as well as a Tradesman, or a Lay-Gentleman? He would probably, at least, make as good a Use of his Wealth, as either of Them: And is there any Ab&rehy;surdity in the Thing it self? Why No: But the Saying is ill-natured, cruel, prophane, and very wicked, as well as senseless, and foolish; And in That all the Luxury of it consists.

Another Maxim they have among them, nearly akin to the Former, viz. That a Clergyman will be sure to lose nothing that's to be got. Do they then really think, that We are peculiarly distinguished by This Cha&rehy;racter? Are We certainly more rapacious in getting, and more tenacious in keeping, than any other Set of Men; than Traders of all Kinds, and Persons possessed of Temporal Estates? Do they in their Consciences believe This? Do they not know the Contrary? The Poverty of the Church has been already considered: And were This true, That might, in some measure at least, plead our Excuse. Besides, We are obli&rehy;ged, not only in Interest, but in Conscience, to preserve the little Revenues of the Church from being still less; that our Suc&rehy;cessors may not be injured by our Neg&rehy;ligence. But after all, The Fact again is notoriously false: Insomuch, that I fear Most of Us are wanting to our Duty in the other Extreme. It is well known, that being, by the Genius of our Professi&rehy;on, addicted to abstract Thinking, Retire&rehy;ment, and Contemplation, we are both less careful, and less skilful, in secular Affairs, than other Men. Reason tells us, that in Nature it should be so; and Experience tells us, that in Fact it is so. But These are a couple of popular Sayings, proceeding from the Follies and Vices of Those who use them; and doing much Mischief to Chri&rehy;stianity; utter'd either with no Meaning, or with a very ill one; very often too ut&rehy;ter'd in the Company of Clergymen; and so as inconsistent with good Manners, as they are with Religion.

Since I am upon the Subject of These choice Maxims concerning the Clergy, I will mention one more; which is, That they come by what they have very easily. An As&rehy;sertion again so notoriously false, that it would be Folly to go about to disprove it. Surely These, and such like, foolish Aphorisms would be laid aside; did Those who use them speak their real Thoughts, after having considered; What an Ex&rehy;pence is required for the Education of Persons dedicated to the Work of the Mi&rehy;nistry, generally their whole Fortunes, and very often much more; so that for the most part they expend as much as would doubly purchase what they have, and yet labour for all their Lives long, with extreme Fatigue both of Body and Mind: That the Death of Many is occa&rehy;sioned by Those Labours, and for That very Reason their Children are much the sooner Fatherless, and their Wives Wi&rehy;dows: That tho' they have an Advantage over Others, of an equal Fortune, by their ingenuous Education, and Acquaintance and Interest in the World, by which they are some&rehy;what more likely to procure a Provision for their Children; yet That is at least ballanced by their coming late into their Prefer&rehy;ments, or dying soon after it, even when they come into them earlier: That their Hospitality, and Charity, by Both which, in proportion to their Circumstances, they are generally distinguish'd from Others, greatly tend to impoverish them, and to make Them, and their Families, Objects of Charity Themselves; the Minister of the Parish, especially in Country Villages, being of course resorted to, upon all Occasions of That Nature: That their Dues lying in&rehy;termingled with the Possessions of Others, Those Others are hardly persuaded to think they are not their Own; from whence it comes to pass, that they are with great Charge and Difficulty collected, and a great part of them as easily, as they are frequent&rehy;ly, fraudulently, and sacrilegiously, kept back, and withheld from them: That their Kindness very often meets with most un&rehy;grateful Returns from ignorant, and wicked People, who owe their Subsistence, and perhaps Their Lives to them; (for, with&rehy;out venturing too far, or being Empiricks in the noble Art of Medicine, Clergymen may by their Learning be in some degree qualify'd to be Physicians of Bodies, as well of Souls, and generally do give Physick to the Sick, as well as Food to the Hungry: That it is not uncommon for a Person of considerable Birth, and of extraordinary Merit in all respects, to be trampled up&rehy;on, and abused, together with his Wife and Children, by illiterate, unmannered, purse-proud Peasants, purely because he is poor, and a Clergyman: In a word, That very many Parochial Cures in This Na&rehy;tion are so miserably unendowed, that, with regard to Them, it would be scarce Sense for a Man to make even That wretched Request which it was prophesy&rehy;ed should be made by the Posterity of Eli, as a Punishment for the Sins of their An&rehy;cestors; Put me, I pray thee, into one of Those Priests Offices; that I may eat a piece of bread. 1 Sam. 2.36.

This is the hard Measure of the Clergy in their Fortunes: And, as if This were not bad enough, they must likewise be slandered, and vilify'd in their Reputation. A fair Requital for the Expence necessarily previous to the Work of the Ministry, and for all their Care, and Kindness, their La&rehy;bours and Watchings, in the actual Exercise of it. According to the Account given by some Men; the Clergy of England are as rich, crafty, powerful, and tyrannical as Those of the Popish Countrys. Whereas in Truth our Church pretends to no Pow&rehy;er in Temporals; and has for some time had little more than the Name of it even in Spirituals: Her Clergy, generally speak&rehy;ing, being artless, and undesigning, to a Fault, and not enough skilled in secular Affairs. Much indeed has been done for their Relief by pious Benefactors, (may the God of Heaven return their Kindness an hundred fold into the bosoms of Them and Theirs:) Especially by our late most ex&rehy;cellent, and truly religious, Queen; whose Piety shall be had in everlasting re&rehy;membrance; and our Childrens Children shall call her blessed. But so great is the Evil; that there is still too much Room for farther Remedy. Which brings us to the Sixth and Last Observation from my Text; viz. That the Temporal Circumstances of Spiritual Persons in This Na&rehy;tion being (as we have seen) very hard and unequal;

VI. Good and pious Christians, whether Laity or Clergy, will, according to their Abilities, contribute to relieve and support them. We cannot, as Elisha did, relieve Widows and Orphans by Miracle; but we may by Charity: Charity, which is greater than the Fides miraculorum it self, more excellent than the Faith, that removes Moun&rehy;tains. Elisha indeed was more than ordi&rehy;narily obliged to be concerned for the Persons and Families of Prophets; because He himself was not only One, but the Chief of them. Yet All truly pious Persons in the Jewish Church ever had, and all such in the Christian Church have, and ever will have, a very great Regard to Both. Be helpful and assisting therefore, liberal and bounti&rehy;ful, to the indigent Prophets, while they live; and to their Relicts, and Orphans, after they are dead: And that not only while they are Partakers of This our Cor&rehy;poration-Charity; but before they come, and that they may never come to stand in need of it. Whenever, and which way soever it be; great is the peculiar and distinguishing Excellence of This Charity. If he that hath pity upon the poor, in gene&rehy;ral, lendeth unto the Lord; how much more does He, that supplys the Wants of his Ministers who wait at his Altar, and of Those who are most nearly related to them? How much more emphatically will the great Highpriest of our profession declare, that (as he condescends to insi&rehy;nuate) he is even personally obliged to Those who have Thus abounded in good Works; Verily I say unto You, Inasmuch as ye did it unto the least of one of These my Brethren, my Brethren in the Priesthood, ye did it unto me. Let the inesti&rehy;mable Benefits they confer excite you to be beneficent to Them; and give the Bread which perisheth to the Persons, and Families, of Those by whose hands the Bread of Life hath been so often admi&rehy;nistered. It is undoubtedly Their indispen&rehy;sable Duty, to endeavour, by all lawful, and honest Means, that their Wives and Children may never be Pensioners to This Society. But if, by the afflicting Providence of God, they become Candi&rehy;dates for it, and are unhappily qualify'd to be duly elected; They are Widows, and Orphans, indeed; and of all such the most proper Objects of Charity. The Father of the Family is dead, probably by the very pains he took in labouring to save Souls: His Relict, and Children, besides the Loss of so dear a Relation, have the additional Calamity of extreme Poverty, occasioned by That very Loss, which is, even in it self, so grievous, and afflictive; are driven from their long-ac&rehy;customed Home, which, however mean, is naturally loved, and with regret forsaken; and peradventure are uncertain where to lay their Heads, within a few days after He is buried. So that to Such all good Christians should have a more parti&rehy;cular View, when they put up That Petition in our excellent Litany; "That it may please thee to defend, and pro&rehy;vide for, the fatherless Children, and Widows, and all that are desolate and oppressed:" And that yet more espe&rehy;cially in These corrupt Times into which We are fallen; when, by the Growth of Profaneness and Irreligion, and Principles destructive of sacred Orders, the Clergy labour under so many other Pressures a&rehy;bove-mentioned; and the Church her self is almost become as a Widow.

But I am insensibly sliding back to the foregoing general Head; and must return to the Subject of This. We make no invidious Comparisons between the Contri&rehy;butions which have been made by Eccle&rehy;siasticks, and Laicks, to This Fund of Cha&rehy;rity: Of what Profession soever they be, may they all find their Reward in Heaven. It is, however, no very cogent Argument (though by Some strongly urged) that We should contribute most; because our Wives, and Children, may come to par&rehy;take of it: There is, I confess, something in This; though it is, at best, but an un&rehy;comfortable Consideration. But We contribute towards it; trusting in God, that, for That very Reason, our Wives, and Children, will be the less likely to partake of it. Be that as it will; certain it is, that, in proportion to our Abilities, the highest Obligation lies upon Us, who are both Sons of Clergymen, and Clergymen ourselves: The Next upon Such as are of That Order, though not in That Rela&rehy;tion: The Third upon Such as are in That Relation, though not of That Or&rehy;der: And the Last upon Those to whom Neither of the aforesaid Characters be&rehy;longs. And yet it may so happen, that the Last mentioned, may, in consideration of their more plentiful Fortunes, be obliged most of all: And so in proportion of the two intermediate Divisions. And to ex&rehy;cite Those to This Charity, who are Laicks, and have no Relation to any Ecclesiastick; it may not be improper for Them to consider, that, since the Reformation, the greatest Mischiefs have ever been brought upon the State, and Peo&rehy;ple, by Those who have been the greatest Enemies to the Church, and Clergy; And so on the Reverse: That the Children of Clergymen are incorporated into all Trades, and Professions; and as ma&rehy;ny Sons of the Clergy are Laymen, so many Sons of the Laity are Clergymen: That, however, in This we All agree, that we are All Christians, and Sons of the Church, though not of the Clergy. Let them, I say, consider These things; ever remem&rehy;bring That of our Blessed Saviour; He that receiveth a Prophet in the name of a Prophet, shall receive a Prophet's reward: And whosoever shall give to drink unto one of these little ones a cup of cold water only, (and much more, if he gives something considerable) in the name of a disciple, shall in no wise lose his reward. Matth. 10.41.42

Nor ought the present distressed State of Affairs to deter us from This good Work; but rather to have the contrary Effect: That so we may avert God's fur&rehy;ther Judgments, which Now hang black and threatning over us. And indeed the best Prospect we have is opened to us by publick Charities: By which This Age, however corrupt in other Respects, is, to its immortal Honour, eminently distin&rehy;guished. But whatever be our Lot in This World; let us do our Duty, trust in God, and be chearful, and of good Courage, particularly do our Duty in the Instance I have been now recommending: By which means we shall have the easier Admit&rehy;tance into everlasting Habitations; even those Habitations, where the Distinction between Clergy and Laity will be abolish&rehy;ed; Where there will be no more Widows nor Orphans; No more Sorrow, nor Crying, nor Pain; No more Marrying, or being gi&rehy;ven in Marriage; No more Controversy in Religion, nor Corruption of any Sort; Where not only Prophesy of all Kinds, as well as Faith, and Hope, but even This Kind of Charity itself shall forever cease; and the Church of Christ be completely Triumphant.

ERRATA.

FINIS.